Women's Ministries
York Rescue Mission
Director: Rev. Paul Gorog
Address: 371 West Market Street/PO Box 1968, York, PA 17405 • Phone: (717) 845-7662 • Website: http://www.yorkrescuemission.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 14
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
To be a Christ-based program teaching the principles and truths of the Bible. To offer support for the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of all the women and children who come to us for assistance regardless of race, color or creed.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Better |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Good |
| Change Process: | Better |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 4
- Program Participants Last Year: 494
- Meets about 25 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 9 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $2,441,604 Program Budget: $184,763 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 2% | 10% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 60% | 48% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 0% | 1% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 2% | 4% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 6% | 2% |
| Other | 30% | 35% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Good |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Good |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Excellent |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Good |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Better |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Good |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Good |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Good |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 20.8 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 60.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 136.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 1.5 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Spiritual and Emotional Maturity
Measure Used:
All of the women who come to the Shelter are extremely dysfunctional spiritually and emotionally. The women who choose to join our New Creation program must attend regular Bible studies, weekly classes, and our new Biblical Principles for Living class, turn in individualized homework dealing with specific issues in their lives, share testimony times and attend church regularly. The women must also have a mentor from a local church.
By reaching out and helping each woman deal with their problems and look at their heart issues they are able to break the cycle of dysfunction and become productive citizens in their home life and society again.
Outcome 2: 30-35% of the women who come to the Shelter have no identification
Measure Used:
We are still seeing more and women who come to us without identification or self-worth. Besides a safe place to stay, we are helping them to be re-established by assisting them in obtaining their identification, Social Security card or Birth Certificate. In order for them to receive welfare or help from many agencies or even begin a job search, they need their identification. This is the first step in helping them to feel like they are themselves again.
Outcome 3: Aid in finding and maintaining a job
Measure Used:
Once a woman has received her identification, she can begin a job search. Through another agency, clients are sent to job training classes. 90-95% of the women obtain jobs and must maintain them in order to be considered being placed in our long-term program. Each woman is checked each day through a daily accomplishment sheet. Our main concern if for the welfare of each woman (and child) that comes through our program and we need to make sure that she is capable of handling her daily stresses and working toward becoming a productive citizen.
Outcome 4: Daily Living Skills
Measure Used:
The clients are given daily chores and have a checklist of disciplines that are to be completed to remain in the program. Last year we began a “Biblical Principles for Living” class which is a mandatory for the women in our program.
We also work with local organizations that provide parent training for the women, as well as a support group to help the women with parenting problems. This is just one example of collaborating with our local agencies to help us teach life skills to our clients.
Outcome 5: Financial Independence
Measure Used:
A savings account is set-up with a bank and the women in the New Creation program pay a small program fee to the Mission. When their program is completed ½ of the money is given back to allow them to set up their own household. By this time, they have learned to budget their money and have taken classes in money management. Our goal is to really encourage each woman to realize that they are a gift from God and that they can make it on their own and have a lot to offer our community!
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
In 2007 our Women's Shelter began major renovations in order to accommodate 90 women and children (up from 20). Due to unforeseen circumstances, we are still not complete. Because of this we had to turn almost 800 women and children away due to lack of space. However, through all of that we were still able to serve 6,042 meals, see 21 commitments to Christ and 2, 357 women attend Bible Studies.
By opening our doors to just the essentials, like food, clothing and shelter, we are opening our hearts and sharing the love of Jesus to women and children who are afraid of life. Many are coming to us because of court orders or a fresh start on life from poor choices they have made. We are here to help them choose a different life-style.
By offering the New Creation program, they are learning to reinforce a healthy and interdependent life (utilizing the community, churches and mentors). Our new “Biblical Principles for Living” class teaches the women practical principles to help them face, deal and endure any problem that comes into their life. We strive to get at the heart issues of their problems so when our clients are finished with the program, they have stabilized their financial futures, become healthy self-supporting members of the community, and built relationships within the Christian community, but most of all — they have learned to love themselves as Christ loves them.
Program Score - Historical Review
Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



