CWJC's Williamson County ESL Program
Christian Women's Job Corps of Middle TN
Director: Mrs. Rebekah Sumrall
Address: P.O. Box 22388, Nashville, TN 37202 • Phone: (615) 244-3669 • Website: http://www.cwjcmiddletn.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 14
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
We create potential for transformation of body, mind, heart, and spirit in the working poor and the Christian community. We do this by equipping women in need with life and employment skills, in a volunteer context in which women help women.
CWJC of Middle TN's Williamson County Satellite in partnership with the Hispanic Church of the Americas recognized the need for ESL in the community. The ESL Program's goal is to help adult women seeking to learn English to improve their lives and opportunities for employment, gain conversational, reading and writing skills in English.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Better |
| Outcome Measures: | Good |
| Change Process: | Excellent |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 0.5
- Program Participants Last Year: 40
- Meets about 8 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 18 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $363,560 Program Budget: $25,930 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 20% | 20% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 1% |
| Individual Gifts | 48% | 48% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 11% | 11% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 11% | 11% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 0% |
| Other | 10% | 9% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Good |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Better |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Good |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Better |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Good |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Excellent |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 23.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 51.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 136.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.5 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Students exhibits the ability to speak and understand spoken English
Measure Used:
Intake assessment, teacher feedback, progress through ESL curriculum and workbook, and mid and final assessments.
Outcome 2: Advanced Students gain stronger reading and writing skills and comprehension and students pursue take the GED or ACT.
Measure Used:
Intake/placement assessment, teacher feedback, progress through ESL curriculum and workbook, mid and final assessments, and success in taking the GED or ACT
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
The women participating in the ESL program gain skills in speaking, reading, and writing the English language. We begin with an initial assessment to determine level of ability and class placement. The participants sign an attendance agreement to show their commitment since there are no fees for the program or childcare. The instructors and volunteers work with the women using curriculum and other tools. Class size is small building a safe environment to learn. Our assessments are reflecting measurable progress and results. However, it is in seeing the women gain higher wage jobs and enter the GED program, that we are seeing them accomplish their dreams.
Learning English helps the women assimilate into our culture. The ESL program gives them a safe environment to develop their skills, gaining confidence and a willingness to speak. The program also touches on life skills such as how to dress. The women who are primarily of Mexican heritage, feel the discrimination in our culture and know they are looked down upon. They want to fit in, acclimate into American life. Teachers, volunteers, and participants were overjoyed when one women gaining strong enough language skills to become a cashier. Similarly, a mother was able to speak to the doctor about her sick child. Speaking English opens doors of great opportunity and changes life for the whole family.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



