The A Way Out Program
Citizens for Community Values Inc. Memphis
Director: Mrs. Carol A. Wiley
Address: P. O. Box 770775, Memphis, TN 38177 • Phone: (901) 452-7884 • Website: http://www.ccvmemphis.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 105
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
The purpose of the A Way Out Program is to assist any woman and her children, regardless of race or religious preference, who desires to leave her profession in the sex for sale industry, namely topless dancers and prostitutes, to permanently escape the industry and re-enter society and the work force addiction free, trained for employment, possessing a value system that promotes a healthy lifestyle physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Good |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 1.5
- Program Participants Last Year: 60
- Meets about 35 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 36 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $354,862 Program Budget: $187,498 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 17% | 17% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 36% | 36% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 34% | 22% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 25% | 25% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 0% |
| Other | 0% | 0% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Excellent |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Excellent |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Good |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Excellent |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 26.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 58.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 140.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 1.5 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Clients permanently leave the sex for sale industry.
Measure Used:
Number of clients who do not return to the industry. AWO maintains a 97% success rate of clients leaving their former profession and lifestyle.
Outcome 2: Clients become addiction free.
Measure Used:
Clients are randomly drug screened and must remain clean to stay in the program and they must complete the AWO's Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP)which is 15 weeks of recovery and lifestyle classes successfully as one phase of the program.
Outcome 3: Clients prepare to become productive in the workforce.
Measure Used:
The number of clients who successfully complete their GED's, job skill training and/or college classes and become gainfully employed.
Outcome 4: Clients learn to budget and manage their finances
Measure Used:
Client completes budget counseling clases and makes a budget and reports to an accountability partner for a period of 3 months to assess their ability to live by the budget they set.
Outcome 5: Client becomes healthy physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually.
Measure Used:
Client's level of attendance in counseling groups and individual weekly sessions and counselor feedback and client's ability to connect with a peer group and regularly attend a church of their choice.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
A Way Out is the only program in Memphis whose target population is women in the sex for sale industry helping them to leave the industry by giving them opportunities to be restored to a healthy, whole life. We provide clients and their children with:
1. Safe housing, food and clothing
2. Psychological assessment and long-term professional counseling.
3. Fifteen week intensive outpatient program, approximately 225 hours of recovery and lifeskill classes as one phase of the program.
3. Bible study, biblically based 12-step program and processing group sessions.
5. Parenting classes, budgeting classes, etiquette classes.
6. Mentoring with a trained mentor.
7. Health, dental care
Program Score - Historical Review
Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



