Project Intercept
Restoration Ministries, Inc.
Director: Mr. Ray C. Banks
Address: 253 East 159th Street, Harvey, IL 60426 • Phone: (708) 333-3370 • Website: http://www.restorationministries.net
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 50
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
The mission of Restoration Ministries' Project Intercept is to help at-risk, underprivileged children and teens avoid destructive behaviors, improve academically, achieve academic success, learn new skills and ultimately become successful, healthy adults.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Better |
| Practice Principles: | Better |
| Faith Related Elements: | Better |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Excellent |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 3
- Program Participants Last Year: 1105
- Meets about 8 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 12 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $2,000,000 Program Budget: $250,000 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 17% | 9% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 26% | 4% |
| Individual Gifts | 13% | 46% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 4% | 7% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 11% | 3% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 9% | 1% |
| Other | 20% | 30% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Good |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Better |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Better |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Good |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Better |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Better |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Better |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Good |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Better |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Good |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 18.8 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 47.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 129.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Youth avoid destructive behaviors like joining gangs and using drugs.
Measure Used:
Attendance is taken in all programs. (Participation in after-school programs decreases the likelihood of children getting involved in destructive behaviors.)
Outcome 2: Youth improve academically.
Measure Used:
Participants' grades are tracked via quarterly Participants are required to give report cards to the program director.
Outcome 3: Youth have a safe and nurturing place to be during non-school hours.
Measure Used:
Attendance is taken in all programs that we offer during non-school hours. (These programs include Homework Help & Tutoring 3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m., Harvey Boxing Club, 3:00 - 6:30, Hoops n' Rap, Fridays 7:00 - 10:00 p.m., Arts Education Center 4:00 - 6:00.)
Outcome 4: Youth meet or exceed standards on state achievement tests.
Measure Used:
Test scores provided to director by students/parents and teachers.
Outcome 5: Participants in our Gallery of the Arts Education Center create art and gain knowledge of art.
Measure Used:
Pre and post tests are given to students in each the beginning and end of each class offered in our Gallery of the Arts Center. Students exhibit their works of art at the Student Art Show held at the end of each session.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
The children who participate in Project Intercept are considered at-risk for low academic achievement, high dropout rate, exposure to and involvement in substance abuse and gangs, low self-esteem, and little or no after-school supervision. Through our Project Intercept programs, children and teens are provided with positive alternatives to the negative influences in their communities. Children who participate in our programs are exposed to new experiences and opportunities to identify and develop their talents and skills like in our Boxing Club and our Gallery of the Arts education program. Our After-School gives children the help they need to achieve academic success and provides them with positive role models in their lives. This leads to a greater sense of self-worth and confidence. Many come from homes where only Spanish is spoken and for these children homework help is a necessity for them to succeed. Once kids begin to see that they can be successful in the classroom, they will often then take chances to get involved with our other program like our Book Clubs, Chess Club, Choir and Art. These programs help children improve academically. This new sense of accomplishment also leads to the child just being happier all around. In our Boxing Club, children and teens learn boxing skills as well as self-discipline that boxing requires. They also learn healthy lifestyle habits and become more physically fit.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



