Harvey House School of Ministry
Restoration Ministries, Inc.
Director: Mr. Ray C. Banks
Address: 253 East 159th Street, Harvey, IL 60426 • Phone: (708) 333-3370 • Website: http://www.restorationministries.net
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 58
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
The Harvey House mission is to help drug addicts and ex-criminals become men of God and productive and contributing people who can, in turn, be of help to those in similar trouble. Our goal is to take men from maintenance to mission
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Better |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 2
- Program Participants Last Year: 102
- Meets about 60 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 12 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $2,000,000 Program Budget: $300,000 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 25% | 9% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 4% |
| Individual Gifts | 40% | 46% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 17% | 7% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 3% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 1% |
| Other | 8% | 30% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Better |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Better |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Better |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Better |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Good |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Better |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 25.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 52.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 135.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Men experience spiritual growth.
Measure Used:
Weekly Accountability Group Meetings.
Attendance at daily devotional classes is taken.
Outcome 2: Participants remain drug and alcohol free.
Measure Used:
Participants are given random drug screening tests and breathalyzer tests.
Outcome 3: Participants develop positive work ethics and work habits.
Measure Used:
Participants are given daily job functions and monthly reviews.
Outcome 4: Participants learn financial responsiblities and money management skills.
Measure Used:
Participants take budgeting classes and all finances are monitored and managed by staff.
Outcome 5: Participants rebuild and restore relationships with family.
Measure Used:
Visits to family and weekend passes to spend time with family are arranged and tracked.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Harvey House is a free Christian-based residential eighteen month program for men with histories of drug and alcohol addictions and criminal backgrounds. Through Bible studies, devotionals, and counseling, men gain an understanding of Christian doctrine, rebuild family relationships, discover their gifts and learn to disciple others. The program is divided into three phases. During Phase One, residents are not allowed visits or phone calls, with the possible exception of family members. The residents are given responsibilities from their first day, including classes, work, prayer and even exercise. They help in Restoration Ministries' other outreach programs including our after-school programs — Homework Help & Tutoring, Boxing Club, Chess Club for kids, Friday Night Basketball program - and our food pantry. AIn addition, all men are required to work an eight hour day in one of our two Thrift Stores. In Phase Two, the residents get mentors who walk with them in every area of their lives. Residents are permitted an overnight pass every other weekend and are encouraged to seek restoration with family.
Upon return, we require a drug screen to uphold our abstinence policy. In Phase Three, residents are encouraged to be leaders here, at home and at church. They get jobs and build up savings. Upon graduation, we hope to have a mature productive Christian man who can help others in the same struggle that he came from.
Program Score - Historical Review
Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



