One Stop Care - Men, Women and Children
Lighthouse Ministries
Director: Mr. Steve I Turbeville
Address: P.O. Box 3112, Lakeland, FL 33801 • Phone: (863) 687-4076 • Website: http://www.lighthousemin.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 60
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
-Help develop a willingness to learn about God and to grow in a relationship with Him.
-Provide relief from the physical trauma of being homeless.
-Help residents learn to respond to others and live according to the principals set forth in Scripture.
-Help develop a vision of success through God.
-Teach residents how to pursue realistic, Godly solutions to life's problems.
-Program Outcomes: Peace, Life Purpose, Fulfillment of Potential
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Excellent |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 33
- Program Participants Last Year: 188
- Meets about 450 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 9 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $1,973,300 Program Budget: $1,705,911 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 12% | 34% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 63% | 40% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 10% | 5% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 5% | 4% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 5% | 12% |
| Other | 5% | 5% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Good |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Excellent |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Better |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Good |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Good |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 24.2 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 58.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 139.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.5 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: God's Peace
Measure Used:
Re-dedication/Relationship with Christ established.
Attitude towards others changes.
Determination and dedication seen in program applications.
Voluntary service to others.
Continual Bible Study on own.
Personal testimony.
Affirmation of mentor.
Affirmation by behavioral teams.
Outcome 2: Life Purpose
Measure Used:
Demonstrates leadership qualities in encouraging others in the program.
Goals set. / Objectives are defined. / Steps are taken to carry out objectives and reach goals. / Established goals. Strategic plan to meet goals. Affirmation by behavior team.
Outcome 3: Fulfillment of Potential. (Continues on even after the program).
Measure Used:
Completes the program.
Completes the educational program.
Obtains or maintains employment.
Demonstrates the ability to get out on own and provide for family as well as self.
Involvement in church/Bible study outside of program.
Establishes performance in education and on the job.
Affirmation by work director. Affirmation by mentor. Affirmation by behavioral team.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Program participants begin the process of changing the moment they agree to join the program and take the necessary steps in improving their life. They are asked to make good choices in their behavior in a structured environment. With the behavioral changes being confronted, transformation of the heart and mind takes place. The process of change and transformation is further achieved through the holistic approach of the program. Spiritually, Jesus said “seek ye first the kingdom of God.” Participants change through Bible Study, discipleship, and counseling. In reference to Community Jesus commands us to love one another. Program participants continue the process of change by learning to restore and build relationships. As for Education we are taught in Proverbs to get all of the knowledge and understanding that we can. Program participants desire and pursue knowledge through personal study and higher education. Last is Industry in which Scripture says that if we do not work then we do not eat. Likewise, we are to do all things including our vocation as unto the Lord. Work ethic is instilled in participants as they are trained and sent out into the workplace. By following these four pathways, program participants complete the transformation process and come to God's peace, life purpose, and fulfillment of potential.
Program Score - Historical Review
Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



