The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2008

Pathways: Residential Recovery Program and Enterprise

Panama City Rescue Mission

Director: Rev. Billy E Fox
Address: 609 Allen Ave, Panama City, FL 32401 • Phone: (850) 769-0783 • Website: http://www.pcrmission.org/recovery.html

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2008
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 12

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

To provide a long-term residential addiction recovery & job training environment for men, women and families where the compassion and love of Christ can empower them to overcome and prevent life's adversities.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Excellent
Practice Principles: Better
Faith Related Elements: Excellent
Outcome Measures: Excellent
Change Process: Excellent

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 15
  • Program Participants Last Year: 200
  • Meets about 30 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 12 months

Board Activities

Check
Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Check
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $1,516,633
Program Budget: $1,113,005
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
7% 7%
Government Grants/Contracts
0% 0%
Individual Gifts
42% 42%
Business/Corporate Gifts
5% 5%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
8% 8%
Dues/Fees/Income
8% 8%
Other
30% 30%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897
Average Program Budget: $417,789
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
19% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
6% 8%
Individual Gifts
37% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
9% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
10% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
8% 9%
Other
9% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Excellent
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Good
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Good
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Excellent
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Better
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Excellent
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Good
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Excellent

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Better
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Excellent
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Excellent
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Excellent
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Excellent
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Good

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Excellent
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Better

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Excellent
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 17.9 Maximum Score: 26.0
Std. Deviation: 3.3 Minimum Score: 8.5
This Program: 24.0

Faith Factors

Average Score: 34.5 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 17.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 59.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 116.5 Maximum Score: 143.0
Std. Deviation: 21.9 Minimum Score: 20.0
This Program: 128.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.4 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.7 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0

Change Processes

Average Score: 1.6 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.7 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: Student will maintain sobriety from illigal drugs and alcohol.

Measure Used:
Random drug tests are performed.


Outcome 2: Student will achieve a true and measurable spiritual reformation that results in better relationships with others around them.

Measure Used:
Self reports of accepting Jesus Christ as personal Lord and savior, become baptised, join and get involved in a local church outside the program. Staff reports (weekly evaluations and counseling sessions) of changes in behavior resulting from a spiritual change within (in areas of sensitivity to others, work standards and interpersonal skills).


Outcome 3: Student will gain new self-esteem through the joys of learning job skills, giving back to their community and accomplishing goals.

Measure Used:
Staff will perform weekly evaluations that measure changes in problem solving, leadership, career ambitions, listening skills, quality of work produced, resilence, tolerance for stress, and judgement. These issues are discussed in weekly counseling meetings.


Outcome 4: Student will achieve economic self-sufficiency through meaningful employment.

Measure Used:
Student will acquire a full-time job that offers a chance for advancement and benefits. Will show their paystubs and open a checking/savings account.


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

Students undergo a self-paced program with self-set goals, which are monitored by the ministry team.

There are five distinct phases of the program.

Phase I- Evaluation: Determining the probability of successfully completing the program.

Phase II- Evangelism and Stabilization: Knowing God, coming to genuine faith, repentance and forgiveness. Preventing relapse into self-destructive behavior, and finding hope in God's promise for a new life.

Phase III- Education: Determining what training will be needed to assist the transition to self-reliance. Preparing for life after program completion with GED preparation, resource management, adult education, and other life skills.

Phase IV- Experience: Engaging in job-readiness training. Students work in areas of the organization, such as food service, reception desk, data entry and our enterprise programs. The enterprise programs help the students learn valuable job skills through various income producing enterprises, which they run. Enterprise programs include a thrift ministry, an appliance repair shop, e-bay auctions, and a community-wide recycling program. These job positions give the student more self-esteem as they achieve their job goals and learn to give back to their community through these service programs.

Phase V- Employment and Entry to Crossroads Program: Acquiring and maintaining full-time work. Continuing discipleship through involvement in a local church and ministry support groups. Moving to supportive transitional housing while making preparations for permanent housing. Ongoing evaluation is crucial to determining whether there is growth.

The ministry team will monitor change in students' behavior in the following areas: Cooperation, Work Ethic, Interpersonal skills, Attitude, and Choices.

Samaritan Award Report - Program Score - Historical Review

Program Score - Historical Review

Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.