Pathways: Residential Recovery Program and Enterprise
Panama City Rescue Mission
Director: Rev. Billy E Fox
Address: 609 Allen Ave, Panama City, FL 32401 • Phone: (850) 769-0783 • Website: http://www.pcrmission.org/recovery.html
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 12
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
To provide a long-term residential addiction recovery & job training environment for men, women and families where the compassion and love of Christ can empower them to overcome and prevent life's adversities.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Better |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Excellent |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 15
- Program Participants Last Year: 200
- Meets about 30 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 12 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $1,516,633 Program Budget: $1,113,005 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 7% | 7% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 42% | 42% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 5% | 5% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 8% | 8% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 8% |
| Other | 30% | 30% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Good |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Good |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Better |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Better |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Good |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Better |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 24.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 59.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 128.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Student will maintain sobriety from illigal drugs and alcohol.
Measure Used:
Random drug tests are performed.
Outcome 2: Student will achieve a true and measurable spiritual reformation that results in better relationships with others around them.
Measure Used:
Self reports of accepting Jesus Christ as personal Lord and savior, become baptised, join and get involved in a local church outside the program. Staff reports (weekly evaluations and counseling sessions) of changes in behavior resulting from a spiritual change within (in areas of sensitivity to others, work standards and interpersonal skills).
Outcome 3: Student will gain new self-esteem through the joys of learning job skills, giving back to their community and accomplishing goals.
Measure Used:
Staff will perform weekly evaluations that measure changes in problem solving, leadership, career ambitions, listening skills, quality of work produced, resilence, tolerance for stress, and judgement. These issues are discussed in weekly counseling meetings.
Outcome 4: Student will achieve economic self-sufficiency through meaningful employment.
Measure Used:
Student will acquire a full-time job that offers a chance for advancement and benefits. Will show their paystubs and open a checking/savings account.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Students undergo a self-paced program with self-set goals, which are monitored by the ministry team.
There are five distinct phases of the program.
Phase I- Evaluation: Determining the probability of successfully completing the program.
Phase II- Evangelism and Stabilization: Knowing God, coming to genuine faith, repentance and forgiveness. Preventing relapse into self-destructive behavior, and finding hope in God's promise for a new life.
Phase III- Education: Determining what training will be needed to assist the transition to self-reliance. Preparing for life after program completion with GED preparation, resource management, adult education, and other life skills.
Phase IV- Experience: Engaging in job-readiness training. Students work in areas of the organization, such as food service, reception desk, data entry and our enterprise programs. The enterprise programs help the students learn valuable job skills through various income producing enterprises, which they run. Enterprise programs include a thrift ministry, an appliance repair shop, e-bay auctions, and a community-wide recycling program. These job positions give the student more self-esteem as they achieve their job goals and learn to give back to their community through these service programs.
Phase V- Employment and Entry to Crossroads Program: Acquiring and maintaining full-time work. Continuing discipleship through involvement in a local church and ministry support groups. Moving to supportive transitional housing while making preparations for permanent housing. Ongoing evaluation is crucial to determining whether there is growth.
The ministry team will monitor change in students' behavior in the following areas: Cooperation, Work Ethic, Interpersonal skills, Attitude, and Choices.
Program Score - Historical Review
Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



