New Life Recovery
Redwood Gospel Mission
Director: Mr. Jeffery Wallace Gilman
Address: P O Box 493, Santa Rosa, CA 95402 • Phone: (707) 578-1830 • Website: http://www.srmission.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 40
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
To provide substance abuse recovery services to chemically dependent/alcoholic individuals in a supportive, drug-free environment so that he/she may begin to develop and implement long-range recovery plans
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Better |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 11.5
- Program Participants Last Year: 53
- Meets about 24 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 10 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $2,380,000 Program Budget: $561,000 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 3% | 3% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 70% | 70% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 20% | 22% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 4% | 4% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 2% | 2% |
| Other | 1% | 1% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Excellent |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Better |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Better |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Better |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Better |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Good |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Good |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 24.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 60.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 136.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Freedom from drug/alcohol dependency
Measure Used:
Graduates attend bi weekly support group meetings. Attendees must be clean and sober. Long term relationships formed at the Mission continue to offer support for a clean and sober environment. Accountability ties are maintained and strengthened through consistent communication among the members of the group.
Outcome 2: Self supporting productive member of the community.
Measure Used:
Follow up records are kept on the graduates for at least 5 years after they leave the program. Phone calls and letters facilitate good communication including invitations to subsequent graduation ceremonies and opportunities to serve in a volunteer capacity
Outcome 3: Grow and maintain a strong healthy relationship with God
Measure Used:
Membership and participation in a local church body indicates an active spiritual life. From the time a candidate enters the program, he/she is directed toward a local church body which often becomes their church home.
Outcome 4: Reconciliation with family members estranged by previous lifestyle choices.
Measure Used:
Many graduates begin to reconnect with family as they work through their recovery. Upon graduation, it is not unusual for them to re- enter society through mended family bonds. This outcome is measured by the number of families who attend the RGM graduation ceremony each year.
Outcome 5: Many of the graduates return to serve and support the Gospel Mission in an effort to "give back" to the community that supported their recovery efforts
Measure Used:
RGM is largely supported by individual donations. Rgm donor database displays 161 graduates are current donors to the Mission programs. They also volunteer their time for special events and mentoring of current program members.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Participants enter the New Life program in desperation, out of options for living any kind of productive life. At the Mission, they are provided the tools to regain control of their lives and experience victory over their alcohol/drug dependence. Faith based principles at the Gospel Mission offer workable parameters for success in the outside world.
The New Life program has an overall success rate of 67% of all who enter the 10-14 month live-in curriculum. These verifiable statistics are more than triple the national average for addiction recovery programs.
Candidates choosing the Mission's New Life program embark upon a journey of relationship building, physical labor and spiritual bonding. Many participants have come from jails and numerous failed attempts at sobriety. Other programs may have rejected them as "unlikely to succeed". At the Mission, program members learn to trust in Jesus and His promise to love them just the way they are. Through Bible study, prayer, counseling, testimony, fellowship and worship, they learn to turn their lives and their addictions over to Him. No longer do they rely on their own strength to overcome life controlling issues, but instead, life becomes manageable through forgiveness of the past and hope in the future while embracing the promise that "His strength is made perfect in my weakness" II Corinthians 12:9.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



