The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2008

Resident Fellowship Program (formerly known as the Christian Men and Women's Shelter Program)

Washington City Mission

Director: Mr. Thomas R. Schaffer
Address: 84 West Wheeling Street, Washington, PA 15301 • Phone: (724) 228-9240 x227 • Website: http://www.citymission.org

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2008
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 36

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

The Resident Fellowship Program (formerly known as the Christian Men and Women's Shelter Program) provides the basic needs of food, shelter, clothing, medical and recovery services, love and encouragement to a broad base of chronically and short-term homeless men, women and their children. The program is designed to help residents address the personal issues and behaviors that caused them to be homeless while equipping them with the skills and self-understanding necessary to be successful in their recovery. The program provides residents with the tools required to bring about permanent change in the quality of their lives and to help restore them to independent living, breaking the cycle of homelessness in their lives.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Better
Practice Principles: Good
Faith Related Elements: Better
Outcome Measures: Good
Change Process: Excellent

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 14
  • Program Participants Last Year: 602
  • Meets about 30 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 3 months

Board Activities

Check
Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Check
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $2,547,000
Program Budget: $1,178,300
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
2% 1%
Government Grants/Contracts
0% 0%
Individual Gifts
79% 77%
Business/Corporate Gifts
8% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
8% 8%
Dues/Fees/Income
3% 2%
Other
0% 4%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907
Average Program Budget: $417,789
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
19% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
6% 8%
Individual Gifts
37% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
9% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
10% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
8% 9%
Other
9% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Excellent
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Excellent
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Excellent
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Excellent
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Excellent
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Better
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Good
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Good

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Good
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Good
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Excellent
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Better
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Excellent
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Excellent

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Excellent
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Good

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Good
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 17.9 Maximum Score: 26.0
Std. Deviation: 3.3 Minimum Score: 8.5
This Program: 20.5

Faith Factors

Average Score: 34.5 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 17.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 48.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 116.5 Maximum Score: 143.0
Std. Deviation: 21.9 Minimum Score: 20.0
This Program: 107.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.4 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.7 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 2.0

Change Processes

Average Score: 1.6 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.7 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: 50% of men exiting our program will exit to independent living arrangements.

Measure Used:
Exit interviews and outcome measurement forms tallied to determine independent living status.


Outcome 2: 60% of the men who enter the long-term program will remain abstinent from alcohol and addictive drugs through their entire stay at the Washington City Mission.

Measure Used:
Outcome Measurement Form that indicates relapse and/or drug/alcohol usage during residency.


Outcome 3: 60% of women exiting our program will exit to independent living arrangements.

Measure Used:
Exit interviews and outcome measurement forms tallied to determine independent living status.


Outcome 4: 60% of the women who enter the long-term program will remain abstinent from alcohol and addictive drugs through their entire stay at the Washington City Mission.

Measure Used:
Outcome Measurement Form that indicates relapse and/or drug/alcohol usage during residency.


Outcome 5: N/A

Measure Used:
N/A


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

A homeless person enters the Mission as a guest and is assigned a bed. Food, clothing, shelter, medical care and counseling is available. Resident receives psycho-social and medical evaluations. Resident either enters the program or is referred to appropriate services. Program participants work toward individual needs-based stability through the program and collaborative services for their first three months (Phase I). Resident increases program responsibility by participating is a series of classes and groups in addition to work training, counseling and job-seeking (Phase II). After six months, resident begins outside employment, develops a savings plan, and begins seeking outside housing in preparation to establish independent living arrangements (Phase III). The resident then moves into independent housing. The program seeks to help homeless men and women address problems and self-destructive behaviors so that when they leave the program they will be connected to a support system and possess the skills and self-understanding to be successful and not return to the self-destructive behaviors causing them to be homeless.

Samaritan Award Report - Program Score - Historical Review

Program Score - Historical Review

Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.