Recovery Program
Promise of Hope, Inc.
Director: Mrs. Denise C. Dobbins
Address: P O Box 321, Dudley, GA 31022 • Phone: (478) 676-4673 • Website: http://www.promiseofhopega.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 1520
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
To present to women an understanding of Christ's forgiveness and acceptance through the study of God's Holy Word and 12 step recovery programs.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Good |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 5
- Program Participants Last Year: 36
- Meets about 120 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 12 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $316,776 Program Budget: $335,000 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 2% | 2% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 23% | 23% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 21% | 21% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 9% | 9% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 32% | 32% |
| Other | 13% | 13% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $417,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 19% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 6% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 37% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 10% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 8% | 9% |
| Other | 9% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Better |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Good |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Excellent |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Good |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Better |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Better |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.9 | Maximum Score: | 26.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 8.5 |
| This Program: | 25.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 34.5 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 17.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 56.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.5 | Maximum Score: | 143.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 21.9 | Minimum Score: | 20.0 |
| This Program: | 141.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.6 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.7 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 1.5 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Sobriety- To live a life free of chemical dependencies
Measure Used:
Aftercare program provided. Residents must complete 1 year of monthly aftercare meetings to receive their completion certificate.
Outcome 2: A change in core values and worldly view for self improvement and growth.
Measure Used:
Through faith related attendance in church and visible fruits of the Spirit displayed in daily life.
Outcome 3: Restoring family relationships.
Measure Used:
Achieved through family groups and family education and aftercare groups. All families must participate for completion.
Outcome 4: Former residents reciprocate back into the program and community.
Measure Used:
Expect 80% of former residents who complete the program with successful completion to come back and share their experience, strength and hope with the current residents in the program.
Outcome 5: Awareness of and the beginning of a life changing relationship with God.
Measure Used:
Through daily quiet times and meditations, spiritual life group and Serenity Bible group.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
The women come in not understanding how they can live without the use of drugs. They don't understand how God can love them. We teach them about rules. We teach them how to be honest. We show them that they will have consequences for their actions but that we are there for them. We show them unconditional love the way Jesus showed us. We teach them the difference between a need and a want. We work with them on being honest, open-minded and willing. We teach them that they cannot control what other people do or say but only control how they react to it or the situation or person. We take them through a Faith based 12-step program. We work with the family members including the children. We show the women that they can be the wives, mothers, daughters, granddaughters and friends that Jesus intended us to be. We show them that they are worthy of God's love. We don't take this disease or this program lightly and we don't let the residents take it lightly either.
Program Score - Historical Review
Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



