The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2007

Unsung Heroes

The Cedar Tree Institute

Director: Rev. Jon W. Magnuson
Address: 403 East Michigan Street, Marquette, MI 49866 • Phone: 906-228-5494 • Website: http://www.cedartreeinstitute.com

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2007
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 10

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

Unsung Heroes is a support and self-renewal training program for nursing home, hospice and home health care workers. Unsung Heroes provides a wide range of faith-based spiritual, stress, and coping techniques for rural healthcare workers including often minimum wage employees like hospice and healthcare aids, housekeeping staff, cooks and custodians.

Self-awareness and resiliency training by CTI staff, clergy, social workers and physicians to give medical care and support staff ways to deal with the stressful environment of overburdened rural healthcare, and coping with their own minimum-wage personal budgets and stress-related nutrition concerns. Rural health workers don’t receive this training elsewhere.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Excellent
Practice Principles: Excellent
Faith Related Elements: Better
Outcome Measures: Excellent
Change Process: Better

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 2
  • Program Participants Last Year: 50
  • Meets about 2 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 12 months

Board Activities

Check
Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Check
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $98,700
Program Budget: $14,000
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
40% 33%
Government Grants/Contracts
0% 0%
Individual Gifts
40% 17%
Business/Corporate Gifts
20% 10%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
0% 15%
Dues/Fees/Income
0% 0%
Other
0% 25%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907
Average Program Budget: $480,643
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
24% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
3% 8%
Individual Gifts
36% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
9% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
9% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
7% 9%
Other
10% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Excellent
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Excellent
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Good
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Good
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Good
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Excellent
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Good
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Excellent

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Excellent
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Excellent
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Better
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Better
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Excellent
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Excellent

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Excellent
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Better

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Excellent
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 18.2 Maximum Score: 26.2
Std. Deviation: 3.4 Minimum Score: 6.0
This Program: 23.0

Faith Factors

Average Score: 29.2 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 19.0 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 43.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 115.2 Maximum Score: 149.0
Std. Deviation: 24.9 Minimum Score: 10.0
This Program: 141.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.3 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0

Change Processes

Average Score: 2.1 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.6 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 2.0
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: Increased self-awareness and empathy skills for nursing home, hospice and home health staff

Measure Used:
Written evaluations of training experiences by participants.


Outcome 2: Increased effectiveness of staff interactions with colleagues and patients.

Measure Used:
Three and six month evaluations; Measurements and observations by supervisors on site


Outcome 3: Increased resiliency and health education in areas of diet and stress management.

Measure Used:
Feedback by participants, blood pressure readings and history, weight control measurements, self-reporting of exercise


Outcome 4: Continuing education opportunities, scholarships for conference participation.

Measure Used:
Annually five participants attend conference on grief, bereavement and patient care. Documentation on attending these classes/seminars and reflection essays.


Outcome 5: Educational components on personal financial management for staff workers on minimum wage scales

Measure Used:
Participants complete personal model budgets focusing on credit risks and savings strategies.


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

Participants learn ways to cope with the personal stress of an overburdened, underfunded rural healthcare system that’s stretched to the maximum in areas of supplies, patient needs training, conflict resolution, compassionate care.

These healthcare, hospice and home health employees and support staff are also dealing with their own financial and dietary stress due to a minimum wage pay.

CTI staff, clergy, relaxation experts and others teach coping skills and provide spiritual education that the participants use to provide better patient care and a improve relationship with co-workers.

Participants prepare personal budgets and healthy menus with information from diet, health and budgeting experts and learn how addressing these issues makes other areas of their life more enjoyable.

Participants also learn from each other by describing their own concerns and/or conflicts in a wide range of duties from home health, to end-of-life care, to veterans needs through projects for Veterans Administration employees.

Five of those attending Unsung Heroes are annually given scholarships/grants for continuing education thanks to support for the project from the Marquette Community Foundation. Those who receive grants report back on what they have learned and how it appliers to their medical jobs. Financing for the additional training is not readily available from their own employers due to the economic hard times facing Michigan’s Upper Peninsula that economists have described as the “Second Appalachia” due to the highest unemployment and lowest household income in the state.

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.