Unsung Heroes
The Cedar Tree Institute
Director: Rev. Jon W. Magnuson
Address: 403 East Michigan Street, Marquette, MI 49866 • Phone: 906-228-5494 • Website: http://www.cedartreeinstitute.com
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 10
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
Unsung Heroes is a support and self-renewal training program for nursing home, hospice and home health care workers. Unsung Heroes provides a wide range of faith-based spiritual, stress, and coping techniques for rural healthcare workers including often minimum wage employees like hospice and healthcare aids, housekeeping staff, cooks and custodians.
Self-awareness and resiliency training by CTI staff, clergy, social workers and physicians to give medical care and support staff ways to deal with the stressful environment of overburdened rural healthcare, and coping with their own minimum-wage personal budgets and stress-related nutrition concerns. Rural health workers don’t receive this training elsewhere.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Better |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Better |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 2
- Program Participants Last Year: 50
- Meets about 2 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 12 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $98,700 Program Budget: $14,000 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 40% | 33% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 40% | 17% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 20% | 10% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 0% | 15% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 0% |
| Other | 0% | 25% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $480,643 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 24% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 3% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 36% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 9% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 7% | 9% |
| Other | 10% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Good |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Good |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Good |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Better |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Better |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Better |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 18.2 | Maximum Score: | 26.2 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.4 | Minimum Score: | 6.0 |
| This Program: | 23.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 29.2 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 19.0 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 43.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 115.2 | Maximum Score: | 149.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 24.9 | Minimum Score: | 10.0 |
| This Program: | 141.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.3 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 2.1 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.6 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Increased self-awareness and empathy skills for nursing home, hospice and home health staff
Measure Used:
Written evaluations of training experiences by participants.
Outcome 2: Increased effectiveness of staff interactions with colleagues and patients.
Measure Used:
Three and six month evaluations; Measurements and observations by supervisors on site
Outcome 3: Increased resiliency and health education in areas of diet and stress management.
Measure Used:
Feedback by participants, blood pressure readings and history, weight control measurements, self-reporting of exercise
Outcome 4: Continuing education opportunities, scholarships for conference participation.
Measure Used:
Annually five participants attend conference on grief, bereavement and patient care. Documentation on attending these classes/seminars and reflection essays.
Outcome 5: Educational components on personal financial management for staff workers on minimum wage scales
Measure Used:
Participants complete personal model budgets focusing on credit risks and savings strategies.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Participants learn ways to cope with the personal stress of an overburdened, underfunded rural healthcare system that’s stretched to the maximum in areas of supplies, patient needs training, conflict resolution, compassionate care.
These healthcare, hospice and home health employees and support staff are also dealing with their own financial and dietary stress due to a minimum wage pay.
CTI staff, clergy, relaxation experts and others teach coping skills and provide spiritual education that the participants use to provide better patient care and a improve relationship with co-workers.
Participants prepare personal budgets and healthy menus with information from diet, health and budgeting experts and learn how addressing these issues makes other areas of their life more enjoyable.
Participants also learn from each other by describing their own concerns and/or conflicts in a wide range of duties from home health, to end-of-life care, to veterans needs through projects for Veterans Administration employees.
Five of those attending Unsung Heroes are annually given scholarships/grants for continuing education thanks to support for the project from the Marquette Community Foundation. Those who receive grants report back on what they have learned and how it appliers to their medical jobs. Financing for the additional training is not readily available from their own employers due to the economic hard times facing Michigan’s Upper Peninsula that economists have described as the “Second Appalachia” due to the highest unemployment and lowest household income in the state.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



