Workforce Training Program
Panama City Rescue Mission
Director: Rev. Billy E Fox
Address: 609 Allen Ave, Panama City, FL 32401 • Phone: (850) 769-0783 • Website: http://www.pcrmission.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 5
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
The Panama City Rescue Mission's workforce training program that recycles and resells unused household appliances that would otherwise be filling up landfills. Homeless program participants undergo valuable work training by refurbishing donated household appliances. These homeless provide a needed service to the surrounding needy community, sale of affordable washers, dryers and cooking ranges. The program in turn, strengthens program participants’ self-esteem and builds new job skills. The sales of the refurbished appliances generate self-sustaining funds for the Mission’s homeless work training program.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Good |
| Practice Principles: | Good |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Better |
| Change Process: | Good |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 2.5
- Program Participants Last Year: 20
- Meets about 30 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 3 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $1,516,633 Program Budget: $131,485 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 0% | 7% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 0% | 42% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 0% | 5% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 0% | 8% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 8% |
| Other | 100% | 30% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $480,643 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 24% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 3% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 36% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 9% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 7% | 9% |
| Other | 10% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Good |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Good |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Good |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Good |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Better |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Good |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Better |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Good |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Good |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Good |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Good |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 18.2 | Maximum Score: | 26.2 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.4 | Minimum Score: | 6.0 |
| This Program: | 17.0 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 29.2 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 19.0 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 47.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 115.2 | Maximum Score: | 149.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 24.9 | Minimum Score: | 10.0 |
| This Program: | 117.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.3 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.5 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 2.1 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.6 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 1.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Job knowledge-- Ability to accomplish job tasks accurately, and consistently.
Measure Used:
Decreased mistakes over time
Outcome 2: Improved Character
Measure Used:
Works in harmony with others, willing to accept constructive criticism with teachable spirit, maintains positive and uplifting attitude.
Outcome 3: Soft Jobs Skills Acquired
Measure Used:
Accept responsibility for actions, and perform tasks in timely manner
Outcome 4: Leadership Developed
Measure Used:
Able to lead and influence others, delegates and follows through on projects.
Outcome 5: Improved Appearance
Measure Used:
Appropriately dressed and groomed for job.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Homeless program participants collect appliances donated by local retail stores and individuals. Parts are purchased and homeless trainees repair the appliances. The appliances are then marketed and re-sold in the Mission's thrift stores.
One full-time staff and a late-phase student in the Mission’s homeless recovery program oversee the program, teaching two or three newer program participants at a time.
Supervisors fill out a weekly appraisal for each student and turns them in to case managers. At weekly staff meetings, it is determined whether student is ready to advance to next phases of recovery program.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



