The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2007

Women of Empowerment (WOE)

Neighborhood Christian Centers, Inc.

Director: Dr. JoeAnn Ballard
Address: 785 Jackson Ave., Memphis, TN 38107 • Phone: (901) 881-6013 • Website: http://www.ncclife.org

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2007
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 23

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

The purpose of Women of Empowerment is to directly reach underserved women, particularly single mothers, and indirectly, their young children. We strive to begin working with women during their pregnancies, thereby influencing them from the prenatal period into full parenthood. Program activities focus on the overall health, family stability and education of these families, resulting in foundational improvements.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Excellent
Practice Principles: Excellent
Faith Related Elements: Excellent
Outcome Measures: Good
Change Process: Excellent

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 5
  • Program Participants Last Year: 103
  • Meets about 4 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 12 months

Board Activities

Check
Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Check
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $2,000,000
Program Budget: $52,140
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
30% 35%
Government Grants/Contracts
0% 0%
Individual Gifts
33% 45%
Business/Corporate Gifts
12% 7%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
25% 9%
Dues/Fees/Income
0% 4%
Other
0% 0%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907
Average Program Budget: $480,643
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
24% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
3% 8%
Individual Gifts
36% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
9% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
9% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
7% 9%
Other
10% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Good
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Excellent
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Excellent
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Better
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Good
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Excellent
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Good
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Excellent

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Excellent
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Good
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Excellent
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Excellent
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Excellent
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Excellent

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Excellent
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Better

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Excellent
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 18.2 Maximum Score: 26.2
Std. Deviation: 3.4 Minimum Score: 6.0
This Program: 23.8

Faith Factors

Average Score: 29.2 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 19.0 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 51.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 115.2 Maximum Score: 149.0
Std. Deviation: 24.9 Minimum Score: 10.0
This Program: 139.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.3 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 1.5

Change Processes

Average Score: 2.1 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.6 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 2.5
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: Improved health for single mothers and their children

Measure Used:
SHORT-TERM

1) Parents increase knowledge and resources to care for the needs of children during the prenatal period and early childhood. In addition, health improves through healthy activities for parents, such as aerobics and walking.

2) Children's health improve through parents' improved health and capacity for good parenting.

LONG-TERM:

Decrease in:

1) teen pregnancies

2) second unwed pregnancies

3) obesity

4) infant mortality (at 14.2 deaths per 1,000 births, Memphis has the worst infant mortality rate in the U.S.)

Increase in:

1) prenatal care

2) immunizations


Outcome 2: Improved stability of underserved families

Measure Used:
SHORT-TERM:

1) Single mothers increase stability due to practical and spiritual help as well as through participation in the program and hopefully, a supportive church.

2) Stability increases in the lives of young children, as their parents' lives become more stable.

LONG-TERM:

Decrease in:

1) number of children removed from the home

2) transience

Increase in:

1) number of two-parent households

2) % of households with earned income

3) participation in NCC programs

4) regular church attendance


Outcome 3: Improved educational attainment for single mothers and their children

Measure Used:
SHORT-TERM:

1) Adults earn a GED or college degree through local institutions.

2) Adults increase job readiness through gaining marketable computer and other job skills.

3) Children's school readiness improves by age six.

LONG-TERM:

Increase in :

1) % of adult population having a high school diploma/GED and enrolled in post secondary education and earning degrees

2) Healthy early child development for 0-5 year olds


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

First, participants learn and dialogue about the systemic issues that have caused them to become "stuck" in unhealthy lifestyes. Next, they learn to personally evaluate themselves and set goals for the changes they want to make. Finally, they are guided by staff, volunteers and past participants to achieve their goals. This past year, 20 returned to school, 1 earned a GED, 15 found employment, 1 purchased a home, and 7 moved from subsidized housing to rental properties. Our focus on the children ages 0-5 of participatns is a new one, beginning in 2006. However, in the past year, we have already seen the positive effects made on young children as their mothers make changes in their own lives. For example, through prenatal care and training, none of the babies born to women in the last year have become seriously ill or died, and immunization rates have risen well above that of comparison zip codes. In fact, our participants are well above comparison statistics in almost every outcome area, and are bringing up their children with them!

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.