Women of Empowerment (WOE)
Neighborhood Christian Centers, Inc.
Director: Dr. JoeAnn Ballard
Address: 785 Jackson Ave., Memphis, TN 38107 • Phone: (901) 881-6013 • Website: http://www.ncclife.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 23
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
The purpose of Women of Empowerment is to directly reach underserved women, particularly single mothers, and indirectly, their young children. We strive to begin working with women during their pregnancies, thereby influencing them from the prenatal period into full parenthood. Program activities focus on the overall health, family stability and education of these families, resulting in foundational improvements.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Good |
| Change Process: | Excellent |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 5
- Program Participants Last Year: 103
- Meets about 4 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 12 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $2,000,000 Program Budget: $52,140 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 30% | 35% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 33% | 45% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 12% | 7% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 25% | 9% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 4% |
| Other | 0% | 0% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $480,643 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 24% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 3% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 36% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 9% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 7% | 9% |
| Other | 10% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Good |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Better |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Good |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Good |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Better |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Excellent |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 18.2 | Maximum Score: | 26.2 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.4 | Minimum Score: | 6.0 |
| This Program: | 23.8 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 29.2 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 19.0 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 51.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 115.2 | Maximum Score: | 149.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 24.9 | Minimum Score: | 10.0 |
| This Program: | 139.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.3 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 1.5 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 2.1 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.6 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.5 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Improved health for single mothers and their children
Measure Used:
SHORT-TERM
1) Parents increase knowledge and resources to care for the needs of children during the prenatal period and early childhood. In addition, health improves through healthy activities for parents, such as aerobics and walking.
2) Children's health improve through parents' improved health and capacity for good parenting.
LONG-TERM:
Decrease in:
1) teen pregnancies
2) second unwed pregnancies
3) obesity
4) infant mortality (at 14.2 deaths per 1,000 births, Memphis has the worst infant mortality rate in the U.S.)
Increase in:
1) prenatal care
2) immunizations
Outcome 2: Improved stability of underserved families
Measure Used:
SHORT-TERM:
1) Single mothers increase stability due to practical and spiritual help as well as through participation in the program and hopefully, a supportive church.
2) Stability increases in the lives of young children, as their parents' lives become more stable.
LONG-TERM:
Decrease in:
1) number of children removed from the home
2) transience
Increase in:
1) number of two-parent households
2) % of households with earned income
3) participation in NCC programs
4) regular church attendance
Outcome 3: Improved educational attainment for single mothers and their children
Measure Used:
SHORT-TERM:
1) Adults earn a GED or college degree through local institutions.
2) Adults increase job readiness through gaining marketable computer and other job skills.
3) Children's school readiness improves by age six.
LONG-TERM:
Increase in :
1) % of adult population having a high school diploma/GED and enrolled in post secondary education and earning degrees
2) Healthy early child development for 0-5 year olds
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
First, participants learn and dialogue about the systemic issues that have caused them to become "stuck" in unhealthy lifestyes. Next, they learn to personally evaluate themselves and set goals for the changes they want to make. Finally, they are guided by staff, volunteers and past participants to achieve their goals. This past year, 20 returned to school, 1 earned a GED, 15 found employment, 1 purchased a home, and 7 moved from subsidized housing to rental properties. Our focus on the children ages 0-5 of participatns is a new one, beginning in 2006. However, in the past year, we have already seen the positive effects made on young children as their mothers make changes in their own lives. For example, through prenatal care and training, none of the babies born to women in the last year have become seriously ill or died, and immunization rates have risen well above that of comparison zip codes. In fact, our participants are well above comparison statistics in almost every outcome area, and are bringing up their children with them!
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



