Inner Awareness & Skills Training
Vision Youthz
Director: Mr. Gaylon Logan, Jr.
Address: 3001 19th St., 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94110 • Phone: 415.970.2319 • Website: http://www.visionyouthz.org
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 15
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
Supported by the latest research on mindfulness, the Inner Awareness & Skills Training program establishes inner awareness and external stability in the lives of previously detained youth. Working on the root cause of delinquent actions, youth are trained to observe their thoughts and emotions during silent meditation, discuss their insights in weekly leadership circles with peers, and create and execute personal action plans in their inner awareness coaching sessions. Accountability and feedback constantly abound as each youth confronts himself in silence, his peers as mirrors of his experience, and his coach as he reports weekly progress.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Better |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Excellent |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 1.5
- Program Participants Last Year: 70
- Meets about 25 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 6 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $300,000 Program Budget: $140,000 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 70% | 70% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 0% | 0% |
| Individual Gifts | 25% | 25% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 5% | 5% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 0% | 0% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 0% |
| Other | 0% | 0% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907 Average Program Budget: $480,643 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 24% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 3% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 36% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 9% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 7% | 9% |
| Other | 10% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Good |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Better |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Good |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Good |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 18.2 | Maximum Score: | 26.2 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.4 | Minimum Score: | 6.0 |
| This Program: | 23.5 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 29.2 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 19.0 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 33.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 115.2 | Maximum Score: | 149.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 24.9 | Minimum Score: | 10.0 |
| This Program: | 149.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.3 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 2.1 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.6 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Youth shift their efforts toward positive, life-affirming pursuits.
Measure Used:
Non-recidivism, Youth attend voluntarily, School attendance, Obtaining outside employment, Change in peers from negative to positive, Completing probation requirements
Outcome 2: Youth are aware of the thoughts that underlie their emotions & choices.
Measure Used:
Youth self-report in leadership group, Decrease in violent & criminal behavior, Expression of insights about thought-to-action axis, Attendance of meditation & discussion groups, Inner Awareness coaching notes
Outcome 3: Youth feel connected & valued.
Measure Used:
Youth attend voluntarily, Staff & volunteers know youth individually, Youth bring their friends to program, Alumni return to pay visit to staff and volunteers, Youth are involved long-term, No incidents of violence in program or across gangs, Volunteers form mentoring relationships with youth
Outcome 4: Youth shape & buy into the program.
Measure Used:
Youth leadership council issues recommendations, Youth bring friends to program, Youth respect one another and follow honor code principles, Youth present ideas and learn public speaking
Outcome 5: Youth make & meet personal, educational & employment goals.
Measure Used:
Inner Awareness Coaching notes show before and after progress, Metrics track number and type of goals set and completed, Youth attend school, Youth obtain outside employment, Each youth follows own path created with coaching help, Mentors help with complicated goals
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Program participants change as a progression of stages. The first stage typically occurs when the youth first meets us, either while still incarcerated or after release as a referral from the juvenile probation system. In this stage, youth commit to an honor code of respect for others and receive nuts and bolts intensive case management. They are “hired” into the stipend program and therein get incentives for every positive choice they make. They practice silent meditation for the first time, and experience a sense of the sacred, which contrasts the loud and profane of the streetlife they know well. In this stage, they typically burst with inspiration and make big changes that are not sustainable. In the second stage, youth self-sabotage or relapse slightly, as old negative habits and new positive changes compete for their investment. This stage brings integration of who they were and who they are becoming. During this time, youth are supported with intensive inner awareness coaching, weekly meditation/yoga, and Friday youth discussion group. In the third stage, youth find their focus and passion through more advanced inquiry and self-analysis with their coach, fueled by small successes in setting and completing tangible goals. They galvanize their inner world of watching their thoughts and emotions and apply it to explore their outer world through informational interviews and research into areas of interest. Finally, direction takes form as they find outside employment, start their own business, enroll in job training or start college, supported by this loving community.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



