The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2007

Inner Awareness & Skills Training

Vision Youthz

Director: Mr. Gaylon Logan, Jr.
Address: 3001 19th St., 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94110 • Phone: 415.970.2319 • Website: http://www.visionyouthz.org

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2007
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 15

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

Supported by the latest research on mindfulness, the Inner Awareness & Skills Training program establishes inner awareness and external stability in the lives of previously detained youth. Working on the root cause of delinquent actions, youth are trained to observe their thoughts and emotions during silent meditation, discuss their insights in weekly leadership circles with peers, and create and execute personal action plans in their inner awareness coaching sessions. Accountability and feedback constantly abound as each youth confronts himself in silence, his peers as mirrors of his experience, and his coach as he reports weekly progress.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Excellent
Practice Principles: Excellent
Faith Related Elements: Better
Outcome Measures: Excellent
Change Process: Excellent

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 1.5
  • Program Participants Last Year: 70
  • Meets about 25 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 6 months

Board Activities

Check
Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Check
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $300,000
Program Budget: $140,000
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
70% 70%
Government Grants/Contracts
0% 0%
Individual Gifts
25% 25%
Business/Corporate Gifts
5% 5%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
0% 0%
Dues/Fees/Income
0% 0%
Other
0% 0%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907
Average Program Budget: $480,643
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
24% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
3% 8%
Individual Gifts
36% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
9% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
9% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
7% 9%
Other
10% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Excellent
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Excellent
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Excellent
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Excellent
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Good
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Excellent
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Good
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Excellent

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Excellent
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Excellent
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Excellent
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Better
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Excellent
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Excellent

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Excellent
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Good

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Good
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 18.2 Maximum Score: 26.2
Std. Deviation: 3.4 Minimum Score: 6.0
This Program: 23.5

Faith Factors

Average Score: 29.2 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 19.0 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 33.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 115.2 Maximum Score: 149.0
Std. Deviation: 24.9 Minimum Score: 10.0
This Program: 149.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.3 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0

Change Processes

Average Score: 2.1 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.6 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: Youth shift their efforts toward positive, life-affirming pursuits.

Measure Used:
Non-recidivism, Youth attend voluntarily, School attendance, Obtaining outside employment, Change in peers from negative to positive, Completing probation requirements


Outcome 2: Youth are aware of the thoughts that underlie their emotions & choices.

Measure Used:
Youth self-report in leadership group, Decrease in violent & criminal behavior, Expression of insights about thought-to-action axis, Attendance of meditation & discussion groups, Inner Awareness coaching notes


Outcome 3: Youth feel connected & valued.

Measure Used:
Youth attend voluntarily, Staff & volunteers know youth individually, Youth bring their friends to program, Alumni return to pay visit to staff and volunteers, Youth are involved long-term, No incidents of violence in program or across gangs, Volunteers form mentoring relationships with youth


Outcome 4: Youth shape & buy into the program.

Measure Used:
Youth leadership council issues recommendations, Youth bring friends to program, Youth respect one another and follow honor code principles, Youth present ideas and learn public speaking


Outcome 5: Youth make & meet personal, educational & employment goals.

Measure Used:
Inner Awareness Coaching notes show before and after progress, Metrics track number and type of goals set and completed, Youth attend school, Youth obtain outside employment, Each youth follows own path created with coaching help, Mentors help with complicated goals


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

Program participants change as a progression of stages. The first stage typically occurs when the youth first meets us, either while still incarcerated or after release as a referral from the juvenile probation system. In this stage, youth commit to an honor code of respect for others and receive nuts and bolts intensive case management. They are “hired” into the stipend program and therein get incentives for every positive choice they make. They practice silent meditation for the first time, and experience a sense of the sacred, which contrasts the loud and profane of the streetlife they know well. In this stage, they typically burst with inspiration and make big changes that are not sustainable. In the second stage, youth self-sabotage or relapse slightly, as old negative habits and new positive changes compete for their investment. This stage brings integration of who they were and who they are becoming. During this time, youth are supported with intensive inner awareness coaching, weekly meditation/yoga, and Friday youth discussion group. In the third stage, youth find their focus and passion through more advanced inquiry and self-analysis with their coach, fueled by small successes in setting and completing tangible goals. They galvanize their inner world of watching their thoughts and emotions and apply it to explore their outer world through informational interviews and research into areas of interest. Finally, direction takes form as they find outside employment, start their own business, enroll in job training or start college, supported by this loving community.

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.