The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2007

Happy Hands

Happy Hands Education Center

Director: Mr. Al Proo
Address: 5717 E. 32nd Street, Tulsa, OK 74135 • Phone: (918) 660-0855 • Website: http://www.happyhands.org

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2007
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 20

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

Happy Hands stated purpose is to maximize learning for children with a hearing loss by providing them with an early intervention program composed of a pre-school and kindergarten in an all day educational and linguistically stimulating environment.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Excellent
Practice Principles: Excellent
Faith Related Elements: Excellent
Outcome Measures: Excellent
Change Process: Better

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 9
  • Program Participants Last Year: 35
  • Meets about 22 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 48 months

Board Activities

Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $440,766
Program Budget: $360,000
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
55% 35%
Government Grants/Contracts
0% 0%
Individual Gifts
35% 35%
Business/Corporate Gifts
10% 10%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
0% 0%
Dues/Fees/Income
0% 0%
Other
0% 20%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907
Average Program Budget: $480,643
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
24% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
3% 8%
Individual Gifts
36% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
9% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
9% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
7% 9%
Other
10% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Excellent
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Excellent
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Excellent
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Better
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Good
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Better
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Good
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Better

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Excellent
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Excellent
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Better
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Excellent
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Excellent
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Excellent

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Good
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Excellent

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Good
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 18.2 Maximum Score: 26.2
Std. Deviation: 3.4 Minimum Score: 6.0
This Program: 23.5

Faith Factors

Average Score: 29.2 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 19.0 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 52.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 115.2 Maximum Score: 149.0
Std. Deviation: 24.9 Minimum Score: 10.0
This Program: 141.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.3 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0

Change Processes

Average Score: 2.1 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.6 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 2.0
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: Hearing impaired and communication delayed children will increase their language skills through visual and auditory communication receptively and expressively.

Measure Used:
Hope Publications, SKI HI Language Development Scale, Brigance Inventory of Early Childhood Development, Preschool Language Scale IV


Outcome 2: Hearing impaired and communication delayed children will increase their speech articulation proficiency.

Measure Used:
Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation, Informal Speech Samples, Teacher Observation


Outcome 3: Parents of hearing impaired children will increase their sign language skills to communicate with the children.

Measure Used:
ASL and Total Communication post assessments, Parent/Teacher conferences.


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

Children with hearing loss and communication delays in the past have typically achieved at best a second or third grade reading level. This affects reading, writing, and academics - literacy for the remainder of their lives. When early intervention happens for these children, they can and do achieve normal language development which directly affects their literacy skills. We are now seeing these children in middle school and high school programs succeeding along with their hearing peers. We expect these young people to be successful, literate, contributors to their families and communities.

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.