The Salvation Army Family Emergency (SAFE) Center
The Salvation Army of Ada County Booth Family Care Center
Director: Rev. Gordon T. Myers
Address: 4308 W. State Street, Boise, ID 83687 • Phone: 2083435429 • Website: http://www1.usw.salvationarmy.org/usw/www_usw_treasurevalley.nsf/vw-text-dynamic-arrays/C5666F7932882240882573AC0070BCA9?openDocument
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 2
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
The goals of the program are: 1) To immediately make homeless persons safe and sound and to provide for all of their basic human needs.2) To guide residents toward self-sufficiency and successful, independent living and permanent housing. We are currently tripling the size of our shelter in response to community need, because the largest local shelter is closing in the fall and people would have no where to go. Already waiting lists exist.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements: | Better |
| Outcome Measures: | Better |
| Change Process: | Better |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 4
- Program Participants Last Year: 104
- Meets about 30 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 2 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $3,600,000 Program Budget: $429,994 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 10% | 10% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 5% | 3% |
| Individual Gifts | 80% | 80% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 3% | 3% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 2% | 2% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 2% |
| Other | 0% | 0% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897 Average Program Budget: $349,880 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 24% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 2% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 32% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 7% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 11% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 7% | 9% |
| Other | 11% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Excellent |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Better |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Excellent |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Excellent |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Good |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Excellent |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Better |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Better |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Better |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Good |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Better |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Good |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Good |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 17.8 | Maximum Score: | 25.2 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.3 | Minimum Score: | 4.2 |
| This Program: | 21.8 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 28.9 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 18.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 33.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 116.3 | Maximum Score: | 150.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 23.5 | Minimum Score: | 10.0 |
| This Program: | 132.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.4 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.5 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 1.7 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.6 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.0 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: 100 percent of our homeless are made immediately safe and secure.
Measure Used:
The S.A.F.E. Center offers a secure campus with security cameras and 24 hour monitoring. Strict adherence by all to rules, policies, procedures offering safety, security, comfort.
Outcome 2: 100 percent of residents receive nutritionally balanced meals.
Measure Used:
Three meals per day plus snacks Ð set up by a nutritionist are prepared in our kitchen. Bag lunch provided Mon.Ð Fri.
Outcome 3: 100 percent of residents receive their basic necessities.
Measure Used:
Personal care kits provided to each individual, laundry facilities and soap, bathroom/showers, meeting areas for visitors as well as case management and education sessions, chapel available if desired, beds, desks in room for study, gifts for special occasions, phone room, fenced playground, etc. provided.
Outcome 4: Attain Self-sufficiency through individualized, personalized case management.
Measure Used:
Weekly personal case management and educational group sessions. Mutually agreed upon goals set in case management, with required participation and achievement of goals. Educational sessions on wide variety of topics including parenting skills, education skills, budget management, nutrition, health, etc. Also groups for kids.
Outcome 5: Attain Self-sufficiency through applying for all resources and finding permanent housing.
Measure Used:
Case management goals include applying for SSI, health and welfare, ICCP, food stamps, Medicare, or help through other agencies including TSAÕs own Family Services assistance. Agency services may include transportation, clothing, medical help, abuse prevention, etc. 28 percent of our residents moved into permanent housing upon leaving The S.A.F.E. Center in 2004 Ð 23.9 percent transitional housing Ð 3.3 5 other institutions Ð 11.9 percent moved into other emergency shelters Ð 6.5 percent supportive housing. We work with all housing authorities, agencies, and landlords to help clients find permanent housing. All required to apply for section 8 housing, which has limited availability.
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Participants change through compassion and love shown to them through the program and its staff, through physical resources and emotional and spiritual support. Participants also change through their own development and decision-making processes, learning about resources and help available to them, and accepting personal responsibility for their lives. Participants are offered a "better way" and learn to make more positive choices and responsible decisions. Participants confront tough issues in their lives and are supported as they journey toward greater self-sufficiency and learning to ask for help when needed, and offer help to others. Spiritual and heart change is offered if desired.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



