The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2005

Men's Program

Twin Cities Union Gospel Mission

Director: Mr. William Kenneth Cooper
Address: 435 East University, St. Paul, MN 55101 • Phone: 651- 292-1721 • Website: http://www.ugmtc.org

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2005
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 105

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

The Men's Program at the Union Gospel Mission works to transform lives, be a resource, comforter, a challenger for men in crisis, to give them hope, vision, and support. Men in crisis have someone to talk to, can get a meal and a place to stay, then move through steps of addition awareness, barrier assessment, encouragement, and finally training for self-sufficient living.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Excellent
Practice Principles: Better
Faith Related Elements: Excellent
Outcome Measures: Excellent
Change Process: Good

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 27
  • Program Participants Last Year: 116
  • Meets about 30 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 24 months

Board Activities

Check
Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Check
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $8,882,000
Program Budget: $3,069,754
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
11% 11%
Government Grants/Contracts
0% 0%
Individual Gifts
64% 64%
Business/Corporate Gifts
11% 11%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
1% 1%
Dues/Fees/Income
13% 13%
Other
0% 0%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,820,907
Average Program Budget: $349,880
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
24% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
2% 8%
Individual Gifts
32% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
7% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
11% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
7% 9%
Other
11% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Excellent
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Excellent
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Excellent
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Better
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Excellent
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Good
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Excellent
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Better

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Better
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Excellent
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Good
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Excellent
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Better
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Excellent

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Excellent
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Excellent

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Good
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 17.8 Maximum Score: 25.2
Std. Deviation: 3.3 Minimum Score: 4.2
This Program: 22.0

Faith Factors

Average Score: 28.9 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 18.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 51.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 116.3 Maximum Score: 150.0
Std. Deviation: 23.5 Minimum Score: 10.0
This Program: 131.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.4 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0

Change Processes

Average Score: 1.7 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.6 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 1.5
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: participants will remain drug free and sober during all phases of programming.

Measure Used:
staff records, client tracking, results from drug testing


Outcome 2: participants will demonstrate improvement in their spiritual development.

Measure Used:
attend church and bible studies weekly, evening chapel-staff records Client Tracking


Outcome 3: students will meet or exceed set levels for grade equivalencies (g.e.) or skills.

Measure Used:
pre/post assessment in math, instructional reading, reading comprehension, vocabulary, and pass the writing course. Staff records Client Tracking


Outcome 4: students will demonstrate competency in basic computer operations.

Measure Used:
computer literacy assessment and projects.


Outcome 5: candidates will find initial employment 30 days after completing Career Development Program and retain employment for 1 year

Measure Used:
monthly contact forms, public agency records(State of MN), employer verification


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

The process begins with each participants' commitment to change, and to introduce an attitude of working in partnership with staff. Program plans are comprehensive and individually based allowing each person to set personal goals and complete at their own pace. Working at the mission is an integral part of the process that teaches reliability, humility, and a sense of serving Christ and others. After completing the education and employment components of programming, men have up to two years in a safe, supportive environment to rebuild their lives and discover the person God intended them to be.

Samaritan Award Report - Program Score - Historical Review

Program Score - Historical Review

Note: Significant decreases in scores may be the result of incomplete data in a Samaritan Award application.

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.